PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YFYA vs. ACLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YFYA vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFYA achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.21% return.


YFYA

1D
0.41%
1M
1.07%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.59%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.58%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFYA vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YFYA
Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF
2.34%2.88%
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
2.21%4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between YFYA and ACLO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YFYA vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFYA
YFYA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YFYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFYA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
YFYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLO
ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFYA vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YFYAACLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-12.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

3.41

-2.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

19.90

-16.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.29

164.37

-149.08

YFYA vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFYA and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YFYAACLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

7.29

-5.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

5.10

-4.00

Drawdowns

YFYA vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFYA drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFYA and ACLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YFYAACLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-1.01%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.61%

-0.27%

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-0.05%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

0.03%

+0.32%

Volatility

YFYA vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that YFYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YFYAACLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

0.14%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.35%

0.57%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

0.73%

+2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

1.08%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

1.08%

+2.51%

YFYA vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFYA has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

YFYA vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than ACLO's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
4.91%4.87%0.59%
YFYA
Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF
5.14%3.67%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YFYA and ACLO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFYA has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFYA dropped -2.29% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 5.38% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 5.38% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.

YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 4.91% for ACLO.

YFYA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and TCW. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for YFYA and 0.20% for ACLO.

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YFYA and ACLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer