PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YFSNX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YFSNX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with YFSNX having a 21.13% return and YFSIX slightly higher at 21.26%.


YFSNX

1D
1.77%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
21.13%
6M
22.34%
1Y
19.06%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*

YFSIX

1D
1.76%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
21.26%
6M
22.47%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFSNX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
21.13%14.79%-0.47%16.48%-9.39%13.00%18.32%24.48%2.18%20.95%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
21.26%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between YFSNX and YFSIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

1.00

The correlation between YFSNX and YFSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YFSNX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFSNX
YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFSNX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YFSNXYFSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.41

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

4.32

+0.01

YFSNX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFSNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFSNX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YFSNX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFSNX drawdown since its inception was -35.14%, roughly equal to the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFSNX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YFSNXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.14%

-35.10%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.09%

-14.20%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-14.20%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-25.14%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-5.45%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-4.89%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

4.60%

-0.03%

Volatility

YFSNX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) have volatilities of 7.47% and 7.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YFSNXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

7.46%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.33%

15.37%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.09%

22.18%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

15.64%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

16.34%

-0.01%

YFSNX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFSNX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

YFSNX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither YFSNX nor YFSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
0.00%0.00%8.40%7.86%4.33%8.06%4.71%6.59%0.71%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, YFSNX and YFSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

YFSNX has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to YFSIX (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFSNX dropped -35.14% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

YFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YFSNX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer