YFSNX vs. PGVFX

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

YFSNX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N) and PGVFX (Polaris Global Value Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, YFSNX returned 7.57%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for PGVFX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YFSNX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PGVFX.

Performance

YFSNX vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with YFSNX having a 21.13% return and PGVFX slightly higher at 21.30%.

YFSNX

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: 21.13%
• 6M: 22.34%
• 1Y: 19.06%
• 3Y*: 15.36%
• 5Y*: 7.57%
• 10Y*: —

PGVFX

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 21.30%
• 6M: 21.01%
• 1Y: 36.79%
• 3Y*: 22.02%
• 5Y*: 10.29%
• 10Y*: 12.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFSNX vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N	21.13%	14.79%	-0.47%	16.48%	-9.39%	13.00%	18.32%	24.48%	2.18%	20.95%
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund	21.30%	27.01%	5.33%	14.76%	-12.00%	15.38%	6.65%	22.83%	-12.64%	17.03%

Correlation

The correlation between YFSNX and PGVFX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	0.77

The correlation between YFSNX and PGVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

YFSNX vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFSNX

YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 19
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

PGVFX

PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 93
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFSNX vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YFSNX	PGVFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	3.17	-2.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	4.34	-3.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.59	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	4.49	-3.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.33	16.14	-11.81

YFSNX vs. PGVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFSNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the PGVFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFSNX and PGVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YFSNX vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFSNX drawdown since its inception was -35.14%, smaller than the maximum PGVFX drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFSNX and PGVFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	YFSNX	PGVFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.14%	-68.09%	+32.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.09%	-8.76%	-5.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.29%	-12.53%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	-27.58%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.46%	0.00%	-5.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.94%	-11.27%	+6.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	2.43%	+2.14%

Volatility

YFSNX vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) at 4.83%. This indicates that YFSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YFSNX	PGVFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.47%	4.83%	+2.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.33%	10.45%	+4.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.09%	12.43%	+9.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.63%	13.90%	+1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.33%	15.72%	+0.61%

YFSNX vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFSNX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

YFSNX vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison

YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PGVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund	4.26%	5.17%	5.65%	1.68%	3.55%	4.05%	1.55%	3.69%	3.39%	1.50%	1.32%	1.26%
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N	0.00%	0.00%	8.40%	7.86%	4.33%	8.06%	4.71%	6.59%	0.71%	2.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YFSNX and PGVFX in my portfolio?

YFSNX and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YFSNX or PGVFX?

YFSNX has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to PGVFX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFSNX dropped -35.14% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.