YETH vs. LFGY
YETH (Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF) and LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YETH returned -37.52% vs -9.94% for LFGY. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for LFGY.
Performance
YETH vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YETH achieves a -29.17% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 8.72% return.
YETH
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 9.78%
- 6M
- -33.82%
- YTD
- -29.17%
- 1Y
- -37.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -23.46%
LFGY
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- -9.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.96%
YETH vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | -29.17% | -30.07% |
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 8.72% | -9.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between YETH and LFGY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | 0.66 |
The correlation between YETH and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YETH vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank
YETH
LFGY
YETH vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YETH | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.99 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | -0.28 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -0.58 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YETH vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YETH drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than LFGY's maximum drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YETH and LFGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YETH | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -35.94% | -28.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.73% | -35.94% | -22.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.73% | -16.95% | -39.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.83% | -14.06% | -18.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.32% | 17.19% | +19.13% |
Volatility
YETH vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) is 10.41%, while YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that YETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YETH | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.41% | 11.39% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.19% | 32.38% | +7.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.84% | 39.55% | +18.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.15% | 42.27% | +12.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.15% | 42.27% | +12.88% |
YETH vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
YETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LFGY's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
YETH vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison
YETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 124.40%, more than LFGY's 85.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 85.09% | 94.90% | 0.00% |
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | 124.40% | 109.12% | 20.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YETH and LFGY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFGY has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to YETH (10.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YETH dropped -64.41% vs LFGY's -35.94%.
On 1-year performance, LFGY leads with -9.94% vs -37.52% for YETH. On fees, YETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YETH has been the lower-risk option at 10.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LFGY has performed better with a -9.94% return vs -37.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.
YETH has the higher dividend yield at 124.40%, compared with 85.09% for LFGY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YETH and 1.02% for LFGY.
LFGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.25 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YETH and LFGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer