PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YETH vs. LFGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YETH vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YETH achieves a -37.76% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 14.39% return.


YETH

1D
6.84%
1M
-26.20%
YTD
-37.76%
6M
-37.20%
1Y
-32.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LFGY

1D
4.44%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
14.39%
6M
4.19%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YETH vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YETH and LFGY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.67

The correlation between YETH and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YETH vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YETH
YETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
YETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
YETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
YETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
YETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YETH vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YETHLFGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.05

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

0.14

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

0.30

-1.33

YETH vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YETH and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YETHLFGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

0.13

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.55

0.09

-0.63

Drawdowns

YETH vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YETH drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than LFGY's maximum drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YETH and LFGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YETHLFGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-35.94%

-28.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.73%

-35.94%

-22.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.97%

-12.62%

-49.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.13%

-14.06%

-17.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.51%

16.48%

+15.03%

Volatility

YETH vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) has a higher volatility of 17.00% compared to YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) at 12.43%. This indicates that YETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YETHLFGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.00%

12.43%

+4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.48%

31.17%

+9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.59%

37.80%

+20.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.22%

42.36%

+13.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.22%

42.36%

+13.86%

YETH vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LFGY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YETH vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

YETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 153.07%, more than LFGY's 82.87% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


YETH and LFGY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YETH has higher volatility (17.00%) compared to LFGY (12.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YETH dropped -64.41% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

On 1-year performance, LFGY leads with 4.87% vs -32.39% for YETH. On fees, YETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 12.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LFGY has performed better with a 4.87% return vs -32.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LFGY.

YETH has the higher dividend yield at 153.07%, compared with 82.87% for LFGY.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YETH and 0.99% for LFGY.

LFGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YETH and LFGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer