PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YDEC vs. SMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YDEC vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YDEC achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's 3.09% return.


YDEC

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.81%
YTD
4.41%
6M
4.89%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*

SMAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.09%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.54%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YDEC vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YDEC and SMAX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.55

The correlation between YDEC and SMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YDEC vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YDEC
YDEC Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
YDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
YDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
YDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAX
SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YDEC vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YDECSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.75

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

4.81

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

26.11

-18.08

YDEC vs. SMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the SMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YDEC and SMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YDECSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

3.46

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

2.01

-1.47

Drawdowns

YDEC vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YDEC drawdown since its inception was -23.34%, which is greater than SMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YDEC and SMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YDECSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.34%

-3.90%

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.89%

-1.91%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.09%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-0.40%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.35%

+0.95%

Volatility

YDEC vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) at 0.38%. This indicates that YDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YDECSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

0.38%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.22%

2.10%

+4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.60%

2.67%

+3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.22%

3.67%

+7.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.99%

3.67%

+7.32%

YDEC vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YDEC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

YDEC vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison

YDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YDEC and SMAX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YDEC has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to SMAX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YDEC dropped -23.34% vs SMAX's -3.90%.

On 1-year performance, YDEC leads with 10.42% vs 9.17% for SMAX. On fees, SMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YDEC has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YDEC.

SMAX has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for YDEC.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YDEC and 0.50% for SMAX.

SMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YDEC and SMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer