YDEC vs. COMT
YDEC (FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YDEC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, YDEC returned 4.75%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for COMT. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YDEC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
YDEC vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YDEC achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
YDEC
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- 1Y
- 10.42%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
YDEC vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YDEC FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December | 4.41% | 16.04% | -0.79% | 14.33% | -6.37% | 5.25% | 0.90% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between YDEC and COMT is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020 | 0.18 |
The correlation between YDEC and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
YDEC vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YDEC
COMT
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
YDEC
COMT
Industrials
YDEC
COMT
-
Healthcare
YDEC
COMT
-
Technology
YDEC
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
YDEC
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
YDEC
COMT
-
Basic Materials
YDEC
COMT
-
Communication Services
YDEC
COMT
-
Energy
YDEC
COMT
-
Utilities
YDEC
COMT
-
Real Estate
YDEC
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YDEC vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
YDEC
COMT
YDEC vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YDEC | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 5.95 | -4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 14.11 | -6.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YDEC | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.24 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.64 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.20 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
YDEC vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YDEC drawdown since its inception was -23.34%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YDEC and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YDEC | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.34% | -51.89% | +28.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.89% | -8.02% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.95% | -13.31% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.34% | -29.00% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -4.82% | +4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -24.07% | +19.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 3.38% | -2.08% |
Volatility
YDEC vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) is 2.10%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that YDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YDEC | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | 7.37% | -5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.22% | 18.80% | -12.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.60% | 21.29% | -14.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 21.06% | -9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.99% | 18.89% | -7.90% |
YDEC vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
YDEC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
YDEC vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
YDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
YDEC FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YDEC and COMT have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to YDEC (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YDEC dropped -23.34% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.50% vs 4.75% for YDEC. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, YDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 4.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YDEC.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for YDEC.
YDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YDEC and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YDEC and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer