YCS vs. XLV
YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YCS returned 12.25%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for XLV. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YCS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
YCS vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YCS achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, YCS has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 12.25%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.61% annualized return.
YCS
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 31.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.09%
- 5Y*
- 23.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
XLV
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
YCS vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.54% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.75% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between YCS and XLV is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008 | 0.13 |
The correlation between YCS and XLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YCS vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
YCS
XLV
YCS vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YCS | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.20 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 1.63 | +2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.84 | 3.92 | +8.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YCS | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.14 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 0.43 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.58 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.46 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
YCS vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YCS drawdown since its inception was -49.56%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCS and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YCS | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.56% | -39.17% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -10.47% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.05% | -17.11% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.32% | -17.11% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.32% | -28.40% | +1.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.10% | +4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -7.12% | -12.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 4.34% | -1.69% |
Volatility
YCS vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) is 1.56%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that YCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YCS | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 5.05% | -3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 10.68% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 14.98% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 14.75% | +6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 16.57% | +2.43% |
YCS vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
YCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
YCS vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YCS and XLV have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to YCS (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCS dropped -49.56% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.25% vs 9.61% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 1.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
YCS is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for YCS and 0.08% for XLV.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YCS and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer