PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YCS vs. ULE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YCS vs. ULE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YCS achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly higher than ULE's -5.86% return. Over the past 10 years, YCS has outperformed ULE with an annualized return of 13.63%, while ULE has yielded a comparatively lower -2.44% annualized return.


YCS

1D
0.40%
1M
3.71%
YTD
9.78%
6M
9.63%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
13.63%

ULE

1D
-0.36%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
-5.86%
6M
-6.24%
1Y
-3.43%
3Y*
2.41%
5Y*
-3.57%
10Y*
-2.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YCS vs. ULE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.78%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%
ULE
ProShares Ultra Euro
-5.86%25.97%-11.73%5.08%-15.51%-15.66%14.74%-8.90%-13.40%23.92%

Correlation

The correlation between YCS and ULE is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008

-0.33

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between YCS and ULE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.33 to -0.61, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YCS vs. ULE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ULE
ULE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YCS vs. ULE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YCSULEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.97

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

-0.33

+4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

-0.67

+12.53

YCS vs. ULE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the ULE Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YCS and ULE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YCS vs. ULE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YCS drawdown since its inception was -49.56%, smaller than the maximum ULE drawdown of -72.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCS and ULE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YCSULEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.56%

-72.74%

+23.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-10.48%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

-17.44%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

-38.16%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

-51.30%

+23.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-63.25%

+63.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-46.09%

+26.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

5.16%

-2.51%

Volatility

YCS vs. ULE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) is 2.22%, while ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that YCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YCSULEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

2.65%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

8.95%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.96%

13.14%

+3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

16.09%

+5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

15.21%

+3.75%

YCS vs. ULE - Expense Ratio Comparison

YCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ULE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

YCS vs. ULE - Dividend Comparison

Neither YCS nor ULE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


YCS and ULE have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULE has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCS dropped -49.56% vs ULE's -72.74%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.63% vs -2.44% for ULE. On fees, ULE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.63% return vs -2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

YCS and ULE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while ULE tracks USD/EUR Exchange Rate (-200%). Their fees differ too: 1.00% for YCS and 0.95% for ULE.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YCS and ULE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer