PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULE vs. YCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ULE vs. YCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) and ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ULE vs. YCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULE
ProShares Ultra Euro
-3.35%25.97%-11.73%5.08%-15.51%-15.66%14.74%-8.90%-13.40%23.92%
YCL
ProShares Ultra Yen
-3.59%-6.34%-25.97%-20.46%-26.92%-20.94%7.16%-2.99%0.17%3.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULE achieves a -3.35% return, which is significantly higher than YCL's -3.59% return. Over the past 10 years, ULE has outperformed YCL with an annualized return of -2.78%, while YCL has yielded a comparatively lower -11.45% annualized return.


ULE

1D
2.13%
1M
-4.20%
YTD
-3.35%
6M
-3.70%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
-2.68%
10Y*
-2.78%

YCL

1D
1.08%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
-3.59%
6M
-15.53%
1Y
-16.05%
3Y*
-17.74%
5Y*
-18.74%
10Y*
-11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ULE vs. YCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ULE and YCL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

ULE vs. YCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULE
ULE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

YCL
YCL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULE vs. YCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) and ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULEYCLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

-0.80

+1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

-1.09

+2.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.88

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

-0.59

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.74

-0.96

+3.70

ULE vs. YCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULE Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the YCL Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULE and YCL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULEYCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

-0.80

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.92

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

-0.61

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

-0.50

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between ULE and YCL is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ULE vs. YCL - Dividend Comparison

Neither ULE nor YCL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ULE vs. YCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULE drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, smaller than the maximum YCL drawdown of -88.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULE and YCL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ULEYCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.74%

-88.10%

+15.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-27.44%

+17.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.35%

-66.93%

+25.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

-76.61%

+25.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.27%

-87.87%

+25.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.90%

-52.76%

+6.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

16.82%

-12.54%

Volatility

ULE vs. YCL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) and ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) have volatilities of 4.84% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ULEYCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

4.83%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

12.21%

-3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

20.25%

-3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

20.42%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

18.85%

-3.54%