PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YCS vs. IBDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YCS vs. IBDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YCS achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than IBDU's 0.58% return.


YCS

1D
0.88%
1M
3.30%
YTD
9.35%
6M
8.16%
1Y
30.84%
3Y*
19.46%
5Y*
23.76%
10Y*
13.18%

IBDU

1D
0.13%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.78%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YCS vs. IBDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.35%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%1.85%
IBDU
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
0.58%7.59%3.62%8.67%-13.04%-2.05%10.38%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between YCS and IBDU is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019

-0.46

The correlation between YCS and IBDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.46 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YCS vs. IBDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IBDU
IBDU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IBDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDU Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YCS vs. IBDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YCSIBDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

2.85

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.43

10.47

+1.96

YCS vs. IBDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the IBDU Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YCS and IBDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YCS vs. IBDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YCS drawdown since its inception was -49.56%, which is greater than IBDU's maximum drawdown of -19.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCS and IBDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YCSIBDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.56%

-19.44%

-30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-1.59%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

-4.14%

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

-19.44%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-5.37%

-14.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

0.43%

+2.22%

Volatility

YCS vs. IBDU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a higher volatility of 2.25% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) at 0.68%. This indicates that YCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YCSIBDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

0.68%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

1.56%

+10.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

2.22%

+14.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

5.71%

+15.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

7.30%

+11.68%

YCS vs. IBDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

YCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IBDU's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

YCS vs. IBDU - Dividend Comparison

YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBDU
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
4.66%4.67%4.75%4.21%3.34%2.29%2.42%0.74%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YCS and IBDU have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to IBDU (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCS dropped -49.56% vs IBDU's -19.44%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.76% vs 1.08% for IBDU. On fees, IBDU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDU has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.76% return vs 1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBDU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

IBDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

YCS is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while IBDU is Corporate Bonds. YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while IBDU tracks Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for YCS and 0.10% for IBDU.

IBDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YCS and IBDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer