PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
YBTY vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

YBTY vs. XYLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

YBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. YBTY is actively managed, while XYLD is passively managed. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. YBTY charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.

Performance

YBTY vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF (YBTY) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTY achieves a -24.66% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 8.05% return.

YBTY

1D
-0.56%
1M
-5.44%
6M
-20.86%
YTD
-24.66%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

XYLD

1D
0.49%
1M
1.82%
6M
6.81%
YTD
8.05%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
8.34%
ALL TIME*
8.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

XYLD

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
$36.93M$37.58M$32.35M

YBTY

GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF
$43.99K$66.73K$58.36K

YBTY vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
YBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF		-24.66%-7.56%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF		8.05%1.13%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTY and XYLD is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.61

YBTY vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
YBTY
XYLD

Financial Services

96.0%
11.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.0%

Healthcare

-

8.9%

Industrials

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

38.5%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Financial Services

YBTY
96.0%
XYLD
11.6%

Basic Materials

YBTY

-

XYLD
1.7%

Communication Services

YBTY

-

XYLD
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

YBTY

-

XYLD
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

YBTY

-

XYLD
4.5%

Energy

YBTY

-

XYLD
3.0%

Healthcare

YBTY

-

XYLD
8.9%

Industrials

YBTY

-

XYLD
8.4%

Real Estate

YBTY

-

XYLD
1.8%

Technology

YBTY

-

XYLD
38.5%

Utilities

YBTY

-

XYLD
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

Often compared with YBTY:
YBTY vs. AMDWYBTY vs. DHSBYBTY vs. ARMWYBTY vs. BARYBTY vs. BUCKYBTY vs. GOOYYBTY vs. AMDL
Often compared with XYLD:
XYLD vs. JEPIXYLD vs. QYLDXYLD vs. SPYXYLD vs. RYLDXYLD vs. XYLGXYLD vs. VOOXYLD vs. SCHD

Return for Risk

YBTY vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
YBTY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YBTY vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF (YBTY) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

YBTYXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

2.53

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

3.60

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.56

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

3.40

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

17.69

—

YBTY vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YBTY vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTY drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTY and XYLD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

YBTYXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-33.46%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-5.29%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-15.53%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-18.66%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.46%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.55%

0.00%

-31.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.62%

-3.68%

-16.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

1.02%

—

Volatility

YBTY vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

YBTYXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

1.92%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

5.97%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.19%

7.13%

+13.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

11.27%

+8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

14.15%

+6.04%

YBTY vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTY has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

YBTY vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

YBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.07%, more than XYLD's 10.53% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF		10.53%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%
YBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF		69.07%4.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

YBTY and XYLD have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for YBTY.

YBTY has the higher dividend yield at 69.07%, compared with 10.53% for XYLD.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for YBTY and 0.60% for XYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBTY and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer