YBTY vs. XRMI
YBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. YBTY is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. YBTY charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.
Performance
YBTY vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBTY achieves a -24.66% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's 3.64% return.
YBTY
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -20.86%
- YTD
- -24.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XRMI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $126.16K | $125.56K | $168.31K | |
| $43.99K | $66.73K | $58.36K |
YBTY vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF | -24.66% | -7.56% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 3.64% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBTY and XRMI is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.57 |
YBTY vs. XRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YBTY
XRMI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
YBTY
XRMI
Basic Materials
YBTY
-
XRMI
Communication Services
YBTY
-
XRMI
Consumer Cyclical
YBTY
-
XRMI
Consumer Defensive
YBTY
-
XRMI
Energy
YBTY
-
XRMI
Healthcare
YBTY
-
XRMI
Industrials
YBTY
-
XRMI
Real Estate
YBTY
-
XRMI
Technology
YBTY
-
XRMI
Utilities
YBTY
-
XRMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBTY vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
YBTY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XRMI
YBTY vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF (YBTY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YBTY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YBTY vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBTY drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTY and XRMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBTY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -15.31% | -16.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.55% | -0.23% | -31.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -5.75% | -14.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.25% | — |
Volatility
YBTY vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBTY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.19% | 5.68% | +14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 6.87% | +13.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 6.87% | +13.32% |
YBTY vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBTY has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBTY vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
YBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.07%, more than XRMI's 12.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.52% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
YBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF | 69.07% | 4.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBTY and XRMI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for YBTY.
YBTY has the higher dividend yield at 69.07%, compared with 12.52% for XRMI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for YBTY and 0.60% for XRMI.
Find the right allocation for YBTY and XRMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer