YBTY vs. TSLR
YBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YBTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YBTY charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSLR.
Performance
YBTY vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBTY achieves a -22.03% return, which is significantly higher than TSLR's -34.20% return.
YBTY
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -26.12%
- YTD
- -22.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR
- 1D
- -6.40%
- 1M
- -9.14%
- 6M
- -33.47%
- YTD
- -34.20%
- 1Y
- 16.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTY vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF | -22.03% | -7.56% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -34.20% | -11.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBTY and TSLR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.65 |
YBTY vs. TSLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YBTY
TSLR
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
YBTY
TSLR
-
Basic Materials
YBTY
-
TSLR
-
Communication Services
YBTY
-
TSLR
-
Consumer Cyclical
YBTY
-
TSLR
Consumer Defensive
YBTY
-
TSLR
-
Energy
YBTY
-
TSLR
-
Healthcare
YBTY
-
TSLR
-
Industrials
YBTY
-
TSLR
-
Real Estate
YBTY
-
TSLR
-
Technology
YBTY
-
TSLR
-
Utilities
YBTY
-
TSLR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBTY vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank
YBTY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLR
YBTY vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF (YBTY) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YBTY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YBTY vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBTY drawdown since its inception was -29.16%, smaller than the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTY and TSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBTY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.16% | -82.80% | +53.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.16% | -66.33% | +37.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -50.68% | +31.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.18% | — |
Volatility
YBTY vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBTY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 35.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 62.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.73% | 89.93% | -69.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 115.75% | -95.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 115.75% | -95.02% |
YBTY vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBTY has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBTY vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison
YBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.92%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF | 62.92% | 4.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBTY and TSLR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for YBTY.
YBTY has the higher dividend yield at 62.92%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
YBTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for YBTY and 0.95% for TSLR.
Find the right allocation for YBTY and TSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer