YBTY vs. AMDY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

YBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YBTY charges 1.38%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

YBTY vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF (YBTY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTY achieves a -22.03% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 109.12% return.

YBTY

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -5.44%
• 6M: -26.12%
• YTD: -22.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDY

• 1D: -3.74%
• 1M: 5.57%
• 6M: 115.38%
• YTD: 109.12%
• 1Y: 190.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBTY vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF	-22.03%	-7.56%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	109.12%	3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTY and AMDY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

YBTY vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBTY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 93
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBTY vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF (YBTY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YBTY	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.61	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.49	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.93	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.42	—

Drawdowns

YBTY vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTY drawdown since its inception was -29.16%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTY and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	YBTY	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.16%	-53.92%	+24.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.16%	-6.08%	-23.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.65%	-17.53%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	YBTY	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.73%	57.35%	-36.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.73%	47.17%	-26.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.73%	47.17%	-26.44%

YBTY vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTY has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

YBTY vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

YBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.92%, less than AMDY's 66.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	66.97%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
YBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF	62.92%	4.10%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YBTY and AMDY in my portfolio?

YBTY and AMDY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, YBTY or AMDY?

On fees, AMDY is cheaper at 1.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, YBTY or AMDY?

AMDY is cheaper with a 1.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for YBTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YBTY or AMDY?

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 66.97%, compared with 62.92% for YBTY.

What is the main difference between YBTY and AMDY?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for YBTY and 1.23% for AMDY.