YBTC vs. BTRN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. YBTC is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, YBTC returned -39.52% vs -21.49% for BTRN. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

YBTC vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -23.08% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -10.45% return.

YBTC

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 4.67%
• 6M: -14.64%
• YTD: -23.08%
• 1Y: -39.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.44%

BTRN

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: -9.59%
• YTD: -10.45%
• 1Y: -21.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	$4.93K	$3.86K	$41.54K
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	$1.48M	$1.24M	$1.57M

YBTC vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-23.08%	-4.23%	26.72%
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	-10.45%	4.89%	3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and BTRN is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.68

The correlation between YBTC and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

YBTC vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BTRN

BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 1
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YBTC vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YBTC	BTRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	-1.30	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.38	-1.74	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.76	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	-0.84	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	-1.26	0.00

YBTC vs. BTRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is comparable to the BTRN Sharpe Ratio of -1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and BTRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -48.84%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and BTRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	YBTC	BTRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.84%	-36.97%	-11.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.84%	-25.73%	-23.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.83%	-26.25%	-17.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-15.18%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.47%	17.12%	+14.35%

Volatility

YBTC vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 2.68%. This indicates that YBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YBTC	BTRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.36%	2.68%	+4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.73%	9.75%	+21.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.20%	16.65%	+23.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.43%	29.94%	+10.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.43%	29.94%	+10.49%

YBTC vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both YBTC and BTRN have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

YBTC vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, more than BTRN's 31.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	31.35%	27.76%	2.56%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	80.06%	76.04%	44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YBTC and BTRN in my portfolio?

YBTC and BTRN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YBTC or BTRN?

YBTC has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to BTRN (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -48.84% vs BTRN's -36.97%.

Which ETF is better, YBTC or BTRN?

On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -21.49% vs -39.52% for YBTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YBTC or BTRN?

Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -21.49% return vs -39.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YBTC or BTRN?

YBTC and BTRN have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YBTC or BTRN?

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 80.06%, compared with 31.35% for BTRN.

What is the main difference between YBTC and BTRN?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YBTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.99 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.