YBTC vs. BTRN
YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. YBTC is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, YBTC returned -36.84% vs -17.28% for BTRN. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
YBTC vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -25.51% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.20% return.
YBTC
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -19.76%
- YTD
- -25.51%
- 6M
- -28.64%
- 1Y
- -36.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- 1Y
- -17.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTC vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -25.51% | -4.23% | 28.40% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.20% | 4.89% | 5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBTC and BTRN is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between YBTC and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBTC vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
YBTC
BTRN
YBTC vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YBTC | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.85 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.69 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -1.17 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBTC | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.94 | -0.88 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.00 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
YBTC vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBTC | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.09% | -36.97% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.09% | -25.29% | -21.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.60% | -25.22% | -20.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.94% | -14.43% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.85% | 14.76% | +11.09% |
Volatility
YBTC vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 6.93%. This indicates that YBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBTC | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.73% | 6.93% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.30% | 10.35% | +20.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.25% | 19.84% | +19.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.82% | 30.94% | +9.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.82% | 30.94% | +9.88% |
YBTC vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both YBTC and BTRN have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
YBTC vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 90.64%, more than BTRN's 30.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.57% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 90.64% | 76.04% | 44.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBTC and BTRN have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YBTC has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to BTRN (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -47.09% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -17.28% vs -36.84% for YBTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -17.28% return vs -36.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YBTC and BTRN have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 90.64%, compared with 30.57% for BTRN.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X.
BTRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YBTC and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer