PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBMN vs. GLDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBMN vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBMN achieves a -27.39% return, which is significantly lower than GLDY's -2.30% return.


YBMN

1D
-5.25%
1M
-21.70%
YTD
-27.39%
6M
-38.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDY

1D
-0.58%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-2.30%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBMN vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YBMN and GLDY is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBMN vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBMN

GLDY
GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBMN vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YBMN vs. GLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YBMNGLDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

0.56

-1.17

Drawdowns

YBMN vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBMN drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBMN and GLDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBMNGLDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-13.43%

-37.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.98%

-13.12%

-33.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-3.91%

-27.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

Volatility

YBMN vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBMNGLDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.34%

19.87%

+60.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.34%

19.58%

+60.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.34%

19.58%

+60.76%

YBMN vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBMN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YBMN vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison

YBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.07%, which matches GLDY's 46.42% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


YBMN and GLDY have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, YBMN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

YBMN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDY.

GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 46.42%, compared with 46.07% for YBMN.

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for YBMN and 0.99% for GLDY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBMN and GLDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer