YBIT vs. ZCSH
YBIT (YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds. YBIT is actively managed, while ZCSH is passively managed. Over the past year, YBIT returned -35.27% vs 1002.48% for ZCSH. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YBIT charges 0.99%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.
Performance
YBIT vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBIT achieves a -24.59% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's 41.32% return.
YBIT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -15.67%
- YTD
- -24.59%
- 6M
- -27.08%
- 1Y
- -35.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 47.90%
- YTD
- 41.32%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- 1,002.48%
- 3Y*
- 185.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBIT vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.59% | -2.49% | -0.09% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 41.32% | 446.78% | -9.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBIT and ZCSH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2024 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBIT vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank
YBIT
ZCSH
YBIT vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YBIT | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.48 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 14.55 | -15.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 28.49 | -29.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBIT | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 6.10 | -7.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 0.10 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
YBIT vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and ZCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBIT | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.54% | -93.73% | +48.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.54% | -69.62% | +24.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -71.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.10% | -15.71% | -27.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -74.41% | +59.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.69% | 35.49% | -10.80% |
Volatility
YBIT vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) is 7.77%, while Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a volatility of 48.45%. This indicates that YBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBIT | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 48.45% | -40.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.10% | 94.06% | -64.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.10% | 166.02% | -129.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 136.87% | -98.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 136.87% | -98.24% |
YBIT vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBIT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBIT vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison
YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.02%, while ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | 101.02% | 88.33% | 60.00% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBIT and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZCSH has higher volatility (48.45%) compared to YBIT (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBIT dropped -45.54% vs ZCSH's -93.73%.
On 1-year performance, ZCSH leads with 1002.48% vs -35.27% for YBIT. On fees, YBIT is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YBIT has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 1002.48% return vs -35.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YBIT is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 101.02%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YBIT and 2.50% for ZCSH.
ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.10 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YBIT and ZCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer