YBIT vs. BTRN
YBIT (YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. YBIT is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, YBIT returned -36.59% vs -17.28% for BTRN. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YBIT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
YBIT vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBIT achieves a -26.82% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.20% return.
YBIT
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- -19.50%
- YTD
- -26.82%
- 6M
- -28.95%
- 1Y
- -36.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- 1Y
- -17.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBIT vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | -26.82% | -2.49% | -0.09% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.20% | 4.89% | 12.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBIT and BTRN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between YBIT and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBIT vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
YBIT
BTRN
YBIT vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YBIT | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.85 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | -0.69 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | -1.17 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBIT | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | -0.88 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 0.00 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
YBIT vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBIT | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.54% | -36.97% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.54% | -25.29% | -20.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.78% | -25.22% | -19.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -14.43% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.85% | 14.76% | +10.09% |
Volatility
YBIT vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 6.93%. This indicates that YBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBIT | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 6.93% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.76% | 10.35% | +18.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.16% | 19.84% | +16.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.65% | 30.94% | +7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.65% | 30.94% | +7.71% |
YBIT vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBIT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBIT vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.79%, more than BTRN's 30.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.57% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | 105.79% | 88.33% | 60.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBIT and BTRN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YBIT has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to BTRN (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBIT dropped -45.54% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -17.28% vs -36.59% for YBIT. On fees, BTRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -17.28% return vs -36.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YBIT.
YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 105.79%, compared with 30.57% for BTRN.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YBIT and 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YBIT and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer