PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBIT vs. BTCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBIT vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBIT achieves a -24.59% return, which is significantly lower than BTCI's -22.74% return.


YBIT

1D
-2.50%
1M
-15.67%
YTD
-24.59%
6M
-27.08%
1Y
-35.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCI

1D
-2.56%
1M
-16.29%
YTD
-22.74%
6M
-26.41%
1Y
-33.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBIT vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YBIT
YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF
-24.59%-2.49%16.55%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
-22.74%-1.09%28.24%

Correlation

The correlation between YBIT and BTCI is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.94

The correlation between YBIT and BTCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBIT vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBIT
YBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCI
BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBIT vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YBITBTCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.87

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.75

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

-1.34

-0.09

YBIT vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is comparable to the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBIT and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YBITBTCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

-0.86

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

-0.03

-0.32

Drawdowns

YBIT vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCI drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and BTCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBITBTCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.54%

-44.98%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.54%

-44.98%

-0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.10%

-42.87%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.12%

-15.18%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.69%

25.05%

-0.36%

Volatility

YBIT vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) is 7.77%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 8.35%. This indicates that YBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBITBTCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

8.35%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.10%

30.94%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.10%

38.93%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.63%

40.11%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.63%

40.11%

-1.48%

YBIT vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both YBIT and BTCI have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

YBIT vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.02%, more than BTCI's 43.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
43.16%36.46%6.76%
YBIT
YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF
101.02%88.33%60.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, YBIT and BTCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BTCI has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to YBIT (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBIT dropped -45.54% vs BTCI's -44.98%.

On 1-year performance, BTCI leads with -33.43% vs -35.27% for YBIT. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, YBIT has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTCI has performed better with a -33.43% return vs -35.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YBIT and BTCI have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 101.02%, compared with 43.16% for BTCI.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Neos.

BTCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBIT and BTCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer