YBIT vs. BTCI
YBIT (YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YBIT returned -35.27% vs -33.43% for BTCI. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
YBIT vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBIT achieves a -24.59% return, which is significantly lower than BTCI's -22.74% return.
YBIT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -15.67%
- YTD
- -24.59%
- 6M
- -27.08%
- 1Y
- -35.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -16.29%
- YTD
- -22.74%
- 6M
- -26.41%
- 1Y
- -33.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBIT vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.59% | -2.49% | 16.55% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -22.74% | -1.09% | 28.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBIT and BTCI is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.94 |
The correlation between YBIT and BTCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBIT vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
YBIT
BTCI
YBIT vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YBIT | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.87 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.75 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -1.34 | -0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBIT | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | -0.86 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | -0.03 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
YBIT vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCI drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBIT | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.54% | -44.98% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.54% | -44.98% | -0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.10% | -42.87% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -15.18% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.69% | 25.05% | -0.36% |
Volatility
YBIT vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) is 7.77%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 8.35%. This indicates that YBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBIT | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 8.35% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.10% | 30.94% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.10% | 38.93% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 40.11% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 40.11% | -1.48% |
YBIT vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both YBIT and BTCI have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
YBIT vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.02%, more than BTCI's 43.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 43.16% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | 101.02% | 88.33% | 60.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, YBIT and BTCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BTCI has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to YBIT (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBIT dropped -45.54% vs BTCI's -44.98%.
On 1-year performance, BTCI leads with -33.43% vs -35.27% for YBIT. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, YBIT has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCI has performed better with a -33.43% return vs -35.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YBIT and BTCI have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 101.02%, compared with 43.16% for BTCI.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Neos.
BTCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YBIT and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer