YACKX vs. FQAL
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL).
YACKX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jul 6, 1992. FQAL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016.
Performance
YACKX vs. FQAL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YACKX vs. FQAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 4.19% | 1.34% | 13.15% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 27.49% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | -3.61% | 16.93% | 21.92% | 24.20% | -19.70% | 32.13% | 16.17% | 28.12% | -4.39% | 23.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YACKX achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly higher than FQAL's -3.61% return.
YACKX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
FQAL
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- YTD
- -3.61%
- 6M
- -2.20%
- 1Y
- 14.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YACKX vs. FQAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
YACKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FQAL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
YACKX vs. FQAL — Risk / Return Rank
YACKX
FQAL
YACKX vs. FQAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YACKX | FQAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | 0.87 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | 1.36 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 1.37 | -1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 6.53 | -5.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YACKX | FQAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 0.87 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.69 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.76 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between YACKX and FQAL is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
YACKX vs. FQAL - Dividend Comparison
YACKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.32% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 16.84% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 1.25% | 1.12% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.55% | 1.73% | 1.53% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
YACKX vs. FQAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YACKX drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than FQAL's maximum drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YACKX and FQAL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YACKX | FQAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -33.71% | -12.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.30% | -11.41% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.86% | -25.50% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.67% | -6.04% | -4.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -4.66% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.46% | 2.39% | +3.07% |
Volatility
YACKX vs. FQAL - Volatility Comparison
AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) have volatilities of 4.89% and 4.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YACKX | FQAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 4.99% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.24% | 9.02% | +10.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 16.81% | +4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 16.21% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 17.68% | -1.59% |