XZW0.DE vs. VT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XZW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - XZW0.DE tracks the MSCI World Low Carbon SRI Leaders while VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XZW0.DE returned 12.44%/yr vs 12.10%/yr for VT. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XZW0.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

XZW0.DE vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZW0.DE) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XZW0.DE is traded in EUR, while VT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZW0.DE achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 13.94% return.

XZW0.DE

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 8.16%
• 1Y: 20.03%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 12.44%
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 13.94%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 27.87%
• 3Y*: 17.70%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZW0.DE vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XZW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C	7.60%	6.65%	27.16%	22.75%	-16.66%	37.46%	5.71%	33.05%	-6.04%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.35%	7.90%	24.18%	18.36%	-12.92%	27.11%	6.98%	29.68%	-8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XZW0.DE and VT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2018	0.61

The correlation between XZW0.DE and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XZW0.DE vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZW0.DE

XZW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 46
XZW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XZW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
XZW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
XZW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XZW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 45

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 60
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 60
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZW0.DE vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZW0.DE) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XZW0.DE	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.31	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	3.05	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.43	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	3.99	-2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.27	16.79	-9.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XZW0.DE vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZW0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZW0.DE and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XZW0.DE	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	2.31	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.81	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.56	+0.24

Drawdowns

XZW0.DE vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZW0.DE and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XZW0.DE	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.22%	-39.93%	+6.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.30%	-7.01%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.36%	-20.47%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.36%	-20.47%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.37%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.11%	-5.54%	+0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	1.66%	+1.10%

Volatility

XZW0.DE vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZW0.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 2.64%. This indicates that XZW0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XZW0.DE	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	2.64%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	9.10%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.32%	12.12%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.88%	15.04%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.38%	17.07%	-0.69%

XZW0.DE vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZW0.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XZW0.DE vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

XZW0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.64%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%
XZW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XZW0.DE and VT in my portfolio?

XZW0.DE and VT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XZW0.DE or VT?

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XZW0.DE or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XZW0.DE.

What is the main difference between XZW0.DE and VT?

XZW0.DE tracks MSCI World Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XZW0.DE and 0.06% for VT.