PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZSP.DE vs. XESC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZSP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZSP.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZSP.DE achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly higher than XESC.DE's 9.31% return.


XZSP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.13%
YTD
12.38%
6M
12.90%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
10Y*

XESC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.56%
YTD
9.31%
6M
10.20%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
11.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZSP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XZSP.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C
12.38%5.34%31.24%23.89%-9.05%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
9.31%22.24%11.06%22.50%-3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XZSP.DE and XESC.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2022

0.56

The correlation between XZSP.DE and XESC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZSP.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZSP.DE
XZSP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XZSP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZSP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZSP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XZSP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZSP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZSP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZSP.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XZSP.DEXESC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.25

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.96

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

6.81

-3.60

XZSP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZSP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZSP.DE and XESC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XZSP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZSP.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum XESC.DE drawdown of -46.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZSP.DE and XESC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZSP.DEXESC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.40%

-46.74%

+23.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.81%

-10.88%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.40%

-16.53%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-1.71%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-9.06%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.18%

3.13%

+6.05%

Volatility

XZSP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZSP.DE) is 3.32%, while Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that XZSP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XESC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZSP.DEXESC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.52%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

13.23%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.64%

16.03%

+8.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

17.56%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

17.98%

+0.43%

XZSP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZSP.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZSP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZSP.DE nor XESC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XZSP.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZSP.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZSP.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XESC.DE.

XZSP.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. XZSP.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XZSP.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZSP.DE and XESC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer