XZMJ.DE vs. XNAS.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XZMJ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XZMJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XZMJ.DE returned 8.68%/yr vs 18.79%/yr for XNAS.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

XZMJ.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZMJ.DE achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 20.53% return.

XZMJ.DE

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 4.69%
• YTD: 15.31%
• 6M: 14.32%
• 1Y: 29.60%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 8.68%
• 10Y*: —

XNAS.DE

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 7.97%
• YTD: 20.53%
• 6M: 18.71%
• 1Y: 37.14%
• 3Y*: 24.64%
• 5Y*: 18.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZMJ.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XZMJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C	15.31%	10.86%	16.16%	14.60%	-16.13%	4.76%
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	20.53%	7.11%	33.75%	51.36%	-29.99%	33.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XZMJ.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021	0.53

The correlation between XZMJ.DE and XNAS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XZMJ.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZMJ.DE

XZMJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 43
XZMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
XZMJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XZMJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 41
XZMJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
XZMJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

XNAS.DE

XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZMJ.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XZMJ.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.40	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	3.18	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.42	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.77	-1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.44	11.16	-3.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XZMJ.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZMJ.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XZMJ.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	2.40	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.93	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.91	-0.46

Drawdowns

XZMJ.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZMJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.90%, smaller than the maximum XNAS.DE drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZMJ.DE and XNAS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XZMJ.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.90%	-31.25%	+4.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.62%	-10.00%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.78%	-26.72%	+7.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.52%	-31.25%	+9.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-0.83%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.01%	-7.83%	+0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	3.38%	+0.45%

Volatility

XZMJ.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) is 3.85%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that XZMJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XZMJ.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	4.31%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.39%	10.91%	+5.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.61%	15.71%	+4.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	19.88%	-2.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	19.84%	-2.35%

XZMJ.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XZMJ.DE and XNAS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XZMJ.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZMJ.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XZMJ.DE and XNAS.DE in my portfolio?

XZMJ.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XZMJ.DE or XNAS.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XZMJ.DE or XNAS.DE?

XZMJ.DE and XNAS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

What is the main difference between XZMJ.DE and XNAS.DE?

XZMJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XZMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®.