PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZMJ.DE vs. IUS4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZMJ.DE vs. IUS4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XZMJ.DE having a 15.31% return and IUS4.DE slightly lower at 14.74%.


XZMJ.DE

1D
-1.30%
1M
7.27%
YTD
15.31%
6M
14.58%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*

IUS4.DE

1D
0.43%
1M
5.25%
YTD
14.74%
6M
16.38%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZMJ.DE vs. IUS4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XZMJ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C
15.31%10.86%16.16%14.60%-16.13%7.04%9.18%26.74%-13.08%
IUS4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)
14.74%15.96%9.46%9.42%-7.69%5.35%-2.06%21.73%-16.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XZMJ.DE and IUS4.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2018

0.84

The correlation between XZMJ.DE and IUS4.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZMJ.DE vs. IUS4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZMJ.DE
XZMJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XZMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IUS4.DE
IUS4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IUS4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZMJ.DE vs. IUS4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZMJ.DEIUS4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.67

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

9.26

-1.82

XZMJ.DE vs. IUS4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the IUS4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZMJ.DE and IUS4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZMJ.DEIUS4.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.69

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.55

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.56

-0.11

Drawdowns

XZMJ.DE vs. IUS4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZMJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.90%, smaller than the maximum IUS4.DE drawdown of -32.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZMJ.DE and IUS4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZMJ.DEIUS4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.90%

-32.63%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-10.12%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-12.92%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.52%

-21.47%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-0.73%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-6.41%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

2.92%

+0.91%

Volatility

XZMJ.DE vs. IUS4.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS4.DE) at 3.47%. This indicates that XZMJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZMJ.DEIUS4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

3.47%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.39%

13.58%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.61%

15.94%

+4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

14.91%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

15.94%

+1.55%

XZMJ.DE vs. IUS4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZMJ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IUS4.DE's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

XZMJ.DE vs. IUS4.DE - Dividend Comparison

XZMJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUS4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUS4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.87%1.88%1.70%1.77%2.10%1.47%1.60%1.45%1.41%1.31%1.15%0.70%
XZMJ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZMJ.DE and IUS4.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZMJ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZMJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for IUS4.DE.

XZMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while IUS4.DE tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XZMJ.DE and 0.58% for IUS4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZMJ.DE and IUS4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer