XZMJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XZMJ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XZMJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XZMJ.DE returned 8.68%/yr vs 5.50%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XZMJ.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.

Performance

XZMJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZMJ.DE achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return.

XZMJ.DE

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 4.69%
• YTD: 15.31%
• 6M: 14.32%
• 1Y: 29.60%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 8.68%
• 10Y*: —

XDWH.DE

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: -1.98%
• 6M: -1.51%
• 1Y: 9.79%
• 3Y*: 2.67%
• 5Y*: 5.50%
• 10Y*: 7.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZMJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XZMJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C	15.31%	10.86%	16.16%	14.60%	-16.13%	7.04%	9.18%	26.74%	-13.08%
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C	-1.98%	2.21%	7.44%	0.04%	-0.07%	30.55%	2.69%	27.24%	6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XZMJ.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2018	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between XZMJ.DE and XDWH.DE has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

XZMJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZMJ.DE

XZMJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 43
XZMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
XZMJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XZMJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 41
XZMJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
XZMJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

XDWH.DE

XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 21
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 21
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZMJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XZMJ.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	0.70	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.14	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.13	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	0.93	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.44	2.28	+5.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XZMJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZMJ.DE and XDWH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XZMJ.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	0.70	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.41	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.55	-0.10

Drawdowns

XZMJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZMJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.90%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZMJ.DE and XDWH.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XZMJ.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.90%	-26.08%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.62%	-10.32%	-2.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.78%	-21.12%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.52%	-21.12%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-8.51%	+7.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.01%	-4.82%	-2.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	4.20%	-0.37%

Volatility

XZMJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) is 3.85%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that XZMJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XZMJ.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	4.81%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.39%	9.51%	+6.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.61%	13.69%	+6.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	13.43%	+3.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	14.69%	+2.80%

XZMJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZMJ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XZMJ.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZMJ.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XZMJ.DE and XDWH.DE in my portfolio?

XZMJ.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XZMJ.DE or XDWH.DE?

On fees, XZMJ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XZMJ.DE or XDWH.DE?

XZMJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.

What is the main difference between XZMJ.DE and XDWH.DE?

XZMJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XZMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XZMJ.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.