PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZHE.L vs. XNNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZHE.L vs. XNNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XZHE.L is traded in EUR, while XNNS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNNS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XZHE.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XNNS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZHE.L vs. XNNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XZHE.L
Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.54%5.46%5.93%9.90%0.75%
XNNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-7.69%0.72%30.08%29.40%-15.57%

Correlation

The correlation between XZHE.L and XNNS.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022

0.56

The correlation between XZHE.L and XNNS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZHE.L vs. XNNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XZHE.L vs. XNNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XZHE.L vs. XNNS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility

XZHE.L vs. XNNS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

XZHE.L vs. XNNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZHE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XNNS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XZHE.L vs. XNNS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZHE.L nor XNNS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XZHE.L and XNNS.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZHE.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZHE.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNNS.L.

XZHE.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while XNNS.L is Technology Equities. XZHE.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while XNNS.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XZHE.L and 0.35% for XNNS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZHE.L and XNNS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer