XZHE.L vs. XDEB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L).
XZHE.L and XDEB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XZHE.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR. It was launched on Jun 22, 2022. XDEB.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 5, 2014. Both XZHE.L and XDEB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XZHE.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XZHE.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XZHE.L Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | -1.36% | 5.46% | 5.93% | 9.90% | 3.05% |
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 2.38% | -1.99% | 18.46% | 3.64% | -4.10% |
Different Trading Currencies
XZHE.L is traded in EUR, while XDEB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XZHE.L achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than XDEB.L's 2.38% return.
XZHE.L
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEB.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- -3.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XZHE.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XZHE.L and XDEB.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XZHE.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank
XZHE.L
XDEB.L
XZHE.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XZHE.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | -0.29 | +1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | -0.32 | +1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.96 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.20 | +1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | -0.32 | +4.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XZHE.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | -0.29 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.68 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between XZHE.L and XDEB.L is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XZHE.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XZHE.L nor XDEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XZHE.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XZHE.L drawdown since its inception was -7.78%, smaller than the maximum XDEB.L drawdown of -27.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZHE.L and XDEB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XZHE.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -19.61% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -5.63% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -2.37% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -3.49% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 1.85% | -1.09% |
Volatility
XZHE.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L) is 1.91%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that XZHE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XZHE.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 2.97% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 5.59% | -2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08% | 11.05% | -6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 10.13% | -4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 11.71% | -6.28% |