XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L
XZHE.L (Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C) and XDNS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XZHE.L is a European High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while XDNS.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XZHE.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XDNS.L.
Performance
XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XZHE.L is traded in EUR, while XDNS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDNS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
XZHE.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDNS.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- 16.51%
- 6M
- 15.75%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XZHE.L Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | -0.54% | 5.46% | 5.93% | 9.90% | 3.05% |
XDNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 16.51% | 10.75% | 14.92% | 13.93% | -3.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XZHE.L and XDNS.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2022 | 0.32 |
The correlation between XZHE.L and XDNS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XZHE.L
XDNS.L
XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XZHE.L | XDNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.44 | — |
Drawdowns
XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XZHE.L | XDNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -29.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.66% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.26% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.54% | — |
Volatility
XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XZHE.L | XDNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 19.99% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 18.73% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.89% | — |
XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XZHE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XDNS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Dividend Comparison
XZHE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 1.43% | 1.63% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 2.83% | 1.46% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.20% | 1.97% | 0.64% |
XZHE.L Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XZHE.L and XDNS.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDNS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDNS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XZHE.L.
XZHE.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while XDNS.L is Japan Equities. XZHE.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while XDNS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XZHE.L and 0.15% for XDNS.L.
Find the right allocation for XZHE.L and XDNS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer