PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XZHE.L is traded in EUR, while XDNS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDNS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XZHE.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDNS.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
6.07%
YTD
16.51%
6M
15.75%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
8.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XZHE.L
Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.54%5.46%5.93%9.90%3.05%
XDNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
16.51%10.75%14.92%13.93%-3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XZHE.L and XDNS.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2022

0.32

The correlation between XZHE.L and XDNS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZHE.L

XDNS.L
XDNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XDNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZHE.LXDNS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

Drawdowns

XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZHE.LXDNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

Volatility

XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZHE.LXDNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZHE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XDNS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZHE.L vs. XDNS.L - Dividend Comparison

XZHE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
XDNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
1.43%1.63%1.65%1.81%2.83%1.46%1.79%1.77%1.20%1.97%0.64%
XZHE.L
Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZHE.L and XDNS.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDNS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDNS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XZHE.L.

XZHE.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while XDNS.L is Japan Equities. XZHE.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while XDNS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XZHE.L and 0.15% for XDNS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZHE.L and XDNS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer