XDNS.L vs. XBCU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L).
XDNS.L and XBCU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDNS.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Mar 31, 2015. XBCU.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. It was launched on Apr 9, 2010. Both XDNS.L and XBCU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XDNS.L vs. XBCU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XDNS.L vs. XBCU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 7.90% | 16.58% | 9.87% | 11.58% | -7.42% | 1.12% | 12.12% | 14.51% | -10.22% | 14.74% |
XBCU.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 17.80% | 17.11% | 10.54% | -14.47% | 35.34% | 40.95% | -4.23% | 3.45% | -6.04% | -3.80% |
Different Trading Currencies
XDNS.L is traded in GBp, while XBCU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XBCU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDNS.L achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than XBCU.L's 17.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XDNS.L has underperformed XBCU.L with an annualized return of 9.40%, while XBCU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.
XDNS.L
- 1D
- 4.30%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
XBCU.L
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 17.80%
- 6M
- 30.90%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 17.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDNS.L vs. XBCU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDNS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCU.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XDNS.L vs. XBCU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDNS.L
XBCU.L
XDNS.L vs. XBCU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDNS.L | XBCU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 1.40 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 1.84 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.27 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 3.53 | -1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.77 | 7.52 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDNS.L | XBCU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 1.40 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.99 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.66 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.29 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between XDNS.L and XBCU.L is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XDNS.L vs. XBCU.L - Dividend Comparison
XDNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while XBCU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 1.53% | 1.63% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 2.83% | 1.46% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.20% | 1.97% | 0.64% |
XBCU.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XDNS.L vs. XBCU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDNS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum XBCU.L drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDNS.L and XBCU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDNS.L | XBCU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -62.92% | +38.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -12.60% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.29% | -27.83% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | -37.15% | +12.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.25% | -4.38% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -30.03% | +24.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 3.59% | +0.25% |
Volatility
XDNS.L vs. XBCU.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) at 6.87%. This indicates that XDNS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBCU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XDNS.L | XBCU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 6.87% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 15.55% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 19.34% | +2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 18.18% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 17.20% | +0.13% |