PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZHE.L vs. IUSQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZHE.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XZHE.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IUSQ.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.68%
YTD
12.65%
6M
12.87%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZHE.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XZHE.L
Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.54%5.46%5.93%9.90%3.05%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
12.65%9.02%24.53%18.57%-4.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XZHE.L and IUSQ.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2022

0.59

The correlation between XZHE.L and IUSQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZHE.L vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZHE.L

IUSQ.DE
IUSQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZHE.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XZHE.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZHE.LIUSQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

Drawdowns

XZHE.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZHE.LIUSQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

Volatility

XZHE.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZHE.LIUSQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

XZHE.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZHE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZHE.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZHE.L nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XZHE.L and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XZHE.L.

XZHE.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. XZHE.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XZHE.L and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZHE.L and IUSQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer