PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZEG.DE vs. XMME.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZEG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4D EUR Hedged (XZEG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZEG.DE achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.


XZEG.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
-0.89%
1Y
-0.40%
3Y*
0.67%
5Y*
10Y*

XMME.DE

1D
-1.04%
1M
5.19%
YTD
30.06%
6M
29.85%
1Y
50.91%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZEG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XZEG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4D EUR Hedged
-0.85%0.96%-1.08%3.63%-17.03%-1.50%
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
30.06%18.69%13.82%5.89%-15.00%0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XZEG.DE and XMME.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021

0.04

Over the past year, XZEG.DE and XMME.DE have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZEG.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZEG.DE
XZEG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XZEG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

XMME.DE
XMME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZEG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4D EUR Hedged (XZEG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZEG.DEXMME.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.55

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

4.98

-5.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

18.04

-18.48

XZEG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZEG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZEG.DE and XMME.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZEG.DEXMME.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

3.00

-3.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

0.45

-1.11

Drawdowns

XZEG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZEG.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, smaller than the maximum XMME.DE drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZEG.DE and XMME.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZEG.DEXMME.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-31.96%

+10.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.70%

-10.67%

+6.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.32%

-19.16%

+14.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.14%

-1.04%

-15.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-9.53%

-5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

2.95%

-1.61%

Volatility

XZEG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4D EUR Hedged (XZEG.DE) is 1.42%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that XZEG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZEG.DEXMME.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

7.48%

-6.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

14.90%

-11.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

17.70%

-14.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.79%

16.74%

-10.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.79%

18.61%

-12.82%

XZEG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZEG.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZEG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison

XZEG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while XMME.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XZEG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4D EUR Hedged
2.53%2.40%2.55%1.67%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZEG.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XZEG.DE.

XZEG.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. XZEG.DE tracks FTSE ESG Select World Government Bond Developed Markets (EUR Hedged), while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XZEG.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZEG.DE and XMME.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer