PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZEG.DE vs. HGGA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZEG.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4D EUR Hedged (XZEG.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZEG.DE achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than HGGA.DE's 1.31% return.


XZEG.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
-0.99%
1Y
-0.59%
3Y*
0.67%
5Y*
10Y*

HGGA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.31%
6M
0.93%
1Y
0.17%
3Y*
0.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZEG.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XZEG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4D EUR Hedged
-0.85%0.96%-1.08%3.63%-15.78%
HGGA.DE
HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF
1.31%-4.17%5.69%0.16%-1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XZEG.DE and HGGA.DE is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2022

0.16

The correlation between XZEG.DE and HGGA.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZEG.DE vs. HGGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZEG.DE
XZEG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XZEG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

HGGA.DE
HGGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZEG.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4D EUR Hedged (XZEG.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZEG.DEHGGA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.01

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

0.08

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

0.17

-0.61

XZEG.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZEG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the HGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZEG.DE and HGGA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZEG.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

0.05

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

0.04

-0.70

Drawdowns

XZEG.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZEG.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, which is greater than HGGA.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZEG.DE and HGGA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZEG.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-8.58%

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.70%

-2.04%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.32%

-6.78%

+2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.14%

-4.56%

-11.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-4.18%

-11.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

1.02%

+0.32%

Volatility

XZEG.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4D EUR Hedged (XZEG.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) at 0.53%. This indicates that XZEG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGGA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZEG.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

0.53%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

2.33%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

3.42%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.79%

4.98%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.79%

4.98%

+0.81%

XZEG.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZEG.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HGGA.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZEG.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Dividend Comparison

XZEG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while HGGA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HGGA.DE
HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XZEG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4D EUR Hedged
2.53%2.40%2.55%1.67%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZEG.DE and HGGA.DE have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HGGA.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HGGA.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XZEG.DE.

XZEG.DE tracks FTSE ESG Select World Government Bond Developed Markets (EUR Hedged), while HGGA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XZEG.DE and 0.18% for HGGA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZEG.DE and HGGA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer