PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYPL.DE vs. ECMA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYPL.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XYPL.DE) and Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYPL.DE achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than ECMA.DE's 0.50% return.


XYPL.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
0.81%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.39%
1Y
2.23%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
10Y*

ECMA.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.35%
1Y
1.66%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYPL.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XYPL.DE
Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF
0.59%3.49%5.30%9.38%-0.01%
ECMA.DE
Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc
0.50%2.90%4.30%7.06%-0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XYPL.DE and ECMA.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

0.94

The correlation between XYPL.DE and ECMA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYPL.DE vs. ECMA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYPL.DE
XYPL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XYPL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYPL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYPL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XYPL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYPL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ECMA.DE
ECMA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ECMA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYPL.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XYPL.DE) and Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYPL.DEECMA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.10

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

0.62

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.50

2.07

+0.42

XYPL.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYPL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the ECMA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYPL.DE and ECMA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYPL.DEECMA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

0.53

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.81

+0.20

Drawdowns

XYPL.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYPL.DE drawdown since its inception was -9.99%, which is greater than ECMA.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYPL.DE and ECMA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYPL.DEECMA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-8.91%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-2.68%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.09%

-2.68%

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.76%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-2.10%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.80%

+0.09%

Volatility

XYPL.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XYPL.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) at 1.28%. This indicates that XYPL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECMA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYPL.DEECMA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

1.28%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

2.76%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

3.13%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

4.16%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.63%

4.16%

+0.47%

XYPL.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYPL.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ECMA.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XYPL.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XYPL.DE nor ECMA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XYPL.DE and ECMA.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ECMA.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ECMA.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XYPL.DE.

XYPL.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Corporates Yield Plus, while ECMA.DE tracks Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XYPL.DE and 0.19% for ECMA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYPL.DE and ECMA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer