ECMA.DE vs. EQQB.DE
ECMA.DE (Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc) and EQQB.DE (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ECMA.DE is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor, while EQQB.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ECMA.DE returned 4.49%/yr vs 24.52%/yr for EQQB.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECMA.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQB.DE.
Performance
ECMA.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECMA.DE achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than EQQB.DE's 20.54% return.
ECMA.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 1.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQQB.DE
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 9.26%
- YTD
- 20.54%
- 6M
- 19.36%
- 1Y
- 37.75%
- 3Y*
- 24.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECMA.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECMA.DE Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc | 0.50% | 2.90% | 4.30% | 7.06% | -1.21% |
EQQB.DE Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc | 20.54% | 6.93% | 33.67% | 51.27% | -10.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECMA.DE and EQQB.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECMA.DE vs. EQQB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ECMA.DE
EQQB.DE
ECMA.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECMA.DE | EQQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.42 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 3.73 | -3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.07 | 11.10 | -9.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECMA.DE | EQQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 2.39 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.97 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
ECMA.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECMA.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum EQQB.DE drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECMA.DE and EQQB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECMA.DE | EQQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -26.59% | +17.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -10.08% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.68% | -26.59% | +23.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.82% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -6.77% | +4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 3.39% | -2.59% |
Volatility
ECMA.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) is 1.28%, while Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that ECMA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECMA.DE | EQQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 4.38% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 10.99% | -8.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.13% | 15.73% | -12.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 19.97% | -15.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 19.97% | -15.81% |
ECMA.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECMA.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQB.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECMA.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECMA.DE nor EQQB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECMA.DE and EQQB.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ECMA.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ECMA.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQB.DE.
ECMA.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while EQQB.DE is Nasdaq-100. ECMA.DE tracks Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor, while EQQB.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ECMA.DE and 0.30% for EQQB.DE.
Find the right allocation for ECMA.DE and EQQB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer