ECMA.DE vs. PR1C.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ECMA.DE (Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc) and PR1C.DE (Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - ECMA.DE tracks the Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor while PR1C.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ECMA.DE returned 4.49%/yr vs 4.56%/yr for PR1C.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ECMA.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PR1C.DE.

Performance

ECMA.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) and Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (PR1C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECMA.DE achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than PR1C.DE's 0.63% return.

ECMA.DE

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: 1.66%
• 3Y*: 4.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PR1C.DE

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 0.47%
• 1Y: 2.00%
• 3Y*: 4.56%
• 5Y*: -0.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECMA.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ECMA.DE Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc	0.50%	2.90%	4.30%	7.06%	-1.21%
PR1C.DE Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)	0.63%	3.02%	4.32%	7.43%	-1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ECMA.DE and PR1C.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022	0.96

The correlation between ECMA.DE and PR1C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ECMA.DE vs. PR1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECMA.DE

ECMA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 18
ECMA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ECMA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ECMA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 17
ECMA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ECMA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 19

PR1C.DE

PR1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 20
PR1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
PR1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
PR1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PR1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
PR1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECMA.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) and Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (PR1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECMA.DE	PR1C.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	0.65	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	0.99	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.13	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.62	0.76	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.07	2.59	-0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECMA.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECMA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the PR1C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECMA.DE and PR1C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECMA.DE	PR1C.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53	0.65	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.16	+0.65

Drawdowns

ECMA.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECMA.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum PR1C.DE drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECMA.DE and PR1C.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECMA.DE	PR1C.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.91%	-17.73%	+8.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.68%	-2.61%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.68%	-2.61%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-1.67%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.10%	-5.51%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	0.77%	+0.03%

Volatility

ECMA.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (PR1C.DE) at 1.07%. This indicates that ECMA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECMA.DE	PR1C.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	1.07%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	2.69%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.13%	3.07%	+0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.16%	4.43%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.16%	5.08%	-0.92%

ECMA.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECMA.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1C.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ECMA.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Dividend Comparison

ECMA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1C.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ECMA.DE Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PR1C.DE Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)	2.54%	2.55%	2.19%	1.80%	1.44%	1.32%	1.38%	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECMA.DE and PR1C.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, ECMA.DE and PR1C.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ECMA.DE or PR1C.DE?

On fees, PR1C.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECMA.DE or PR1C.DE?

PR1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ECMA.DE.

What is the main difference between ECMA.DE and PR1C.DE?

ECMA.DE tracks Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor, while PR1C.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ECMA.DE and 0.07% for PR1C.DE.