PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLG vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XYLG vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XYLG vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
-2.15%12.93%22.31%6.23%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
-7.56%52.46%27.67%6.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly higher than GOOP's -7.56% return.


XYLG

1D
0.88%
1M
-3.11%
YTD
-2.15%
6M
2.08%
1Y
14.74%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*

GOOP

1D
4.38%
1M
-3.40%
YTD
-7.56%
6M
15.37%
1Y
68.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XYLG vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XYLG vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLG
XYLG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLG vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLGGOOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

2.41

-1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

3.20

-1.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

3.03

-1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.20

12.30

-5.10

XYLG vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the GOOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLG and GOOP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLGGOOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

2.41

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.26

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between XYLG and GOOP is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XYLG vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.65%, more than GOOP's 13.52% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
14.65%13.94%23.65%4.90%6.43%7.40%1.39%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
13.52%11.79%13.73%2.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XYLG vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and GOOP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLGGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-27.49%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-23.32%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.84%

-15.24%

+11.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-6.44%

+2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

5.75%

-3.67%

Volatility

XYLG vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) is 4.85%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that XYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XYLGGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

11.35%

-6.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

20.01%

-12.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

28.37%

-11.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.02%

24.75%

-10.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.98%

24.75%

-10.77%