PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. SBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. SBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than SBR's 11.57% return. Over the past 10 years, XYLD has underperformed SBR with an annualized return of 8.14%, while SBR has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.


XYLD

1D
0.15%
1M
2.28%
6M
6.06%
YTD
6.98%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.14%
ALL TIME*
8.30%

SBR

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.51%
6M
11.20%
YTD
11.57%
1Y
19.45%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
24.15%
10Y*
16.34%
ALL TIME*
15.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.30M$2.17M$2.74M
$39.54M$38.84M$31.76M

XYLD vs. SBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
6.98%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%
SBR
Sabine Royalty Trust
11.57%14.04%4.06%-13.10%132.08%60.71%-24.24%15.77%-9.61%34.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and SBR is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013

0.21

The correlation between XYLD and SBR shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. SBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SBR
SBR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. SBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLDSBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.15

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

1.03

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.66

2.10

+14.56

XYLD vs. SBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the SBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and SBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. SBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum SBR drawdown of -56.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and SBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDSBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-56.40%

+22.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-18.54%

+13.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-18.54%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

-34.56%

+15.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

-50.71%

+17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-5.64%

+5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-13.61%

+9.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

9.05%

-8.04%

Volatility

XYLD vs. SBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 1.57%, while Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDSBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

3.95%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

15.32%

-9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.98%

24.41%

-17.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.25%

31.69%

-20.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.15%

31.21%

-17.06%

Dividends

XYLD vs. SBR - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.63%, more than SBR's 6.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBR
Sabine Royalty Trust
6.64%7.53%8.41%9.41%10.13%7.72%8.59%7.49%8.98%5.31%5.50%11.82%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.63%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and SBR have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBR has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to XYLD (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs SBR's -56.40%.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and SBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer