XYLD vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XYLD is passively managed, while LQTI is actively managed. Over the past year, XYLD returned 17.66% vs 5.69% for LQTI. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

XYLD vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.16% return.

XYLD

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 4.96%
• 6M: 6.48%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: 11.27%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

LQTI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	4.96%	4.87%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.16%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and LQTI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

XYLD vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD

XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 82
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 85

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XYLD	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	1.12	+1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.87	1.64	+2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.19	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	1.68	+1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.84	5.15	+12.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XYLD vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XYLD	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	1.12	+1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.88	-0.28

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XYLD	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.46%	-3.41%	-30.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.29%	-3.41%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-1.44%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-0.88%	-2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	1.11%	-0.12%

Volatility

XYLD vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 0.88%, while FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XYLD	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	1.65%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.37%	4.02%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.55%	5.10%	+1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.22%	5.97%	+5.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.21%	5.97%	+8.24%

XYLD vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XYLD vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.11%	7.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	10.52%	10.51%	11.54%	10.51%	13.43%	9.07%	7.93%	5.76%	7.12%	5.18%	3.23%	4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XYLD and LQTI in my portfolio?

XYLD and LQTI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XYLD or LQTI?

LQTI has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, XYLD or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, XYLD leads with 17.66% vs 5.69% for LQTI. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XYLD or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 17.66% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XYLD or LQTI?

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LQTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XYLD or LQTI?

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between XYLD and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.