XYLD vs. LHYAX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and LHYAX (Lord Abbett High Yield Fund) are both funds - XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while LHYAX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, XYLD returned 8.33%/yr vs 4.52%/yr for LHYAX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for LHYAX.

Performance

XYLD vs. LHYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than LHYAX's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, XYLD has outperformed LHYAX with an annualized return of 8.33%, while LHYAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.

XYLD

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 5.52%
• 6M: 5.95%
• 1Y: 17.23%
• 3Y*: 11.48%
• 5Y*: 7.73%
• 10Y*: 8.33%

LHYAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 7.44%
• 3Y*: 7.49%
• 5Y*: 2.23%
• 10Y*: 4.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. LHYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	5.52%	8.02%	19.49%	11.10%	-12.05%	19.59%	-0.56%	21.41%	-6.09%	16.49%
LHYAX Lord Abbett High Yield Fund	1.54%	7.44%	7.25%	9.84%	-14.97%	6.16%	4.56%	15.11%	-5.10%	8.53%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and LHYAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013	0.46

The correlation between XYLD and LHYAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XYLD vs. LHYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD

XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 83
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 86

LHYAX

LHYAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
LHYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
LHYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LHYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LHYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
LHYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. LHYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XYLD	LHYAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.03	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	3.47	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.47	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	2.48	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.16	11.07	+6.09

XYLD vs. LHYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the LHYAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and LHYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. LHYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, which is greater than LHYAX's maximum drawdown of -31.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and LHYAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XYLD	LHYAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.46%	-31.68%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.29%	-3.02%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.53%	-4.87%	-10.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.66%	-18.67%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.46%	-24.23%	-9.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.32%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-3.07%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	0.67%	+0.34%

Volatility

XYLD vs. LHYAX - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) at 0.97%. This indicates that XYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LHYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XYLD	LHYAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	0.97%	+1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.76%	2.82%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.80%	3.67%	+3.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.26%	5.09%	+6.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.22%	5.73%	+8.49%

XYLD vs. LHYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than LHYAX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

XYLD vs. LHYAX - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.46%, more than LHYAX's 7.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LHYAX Lord Abbett High Yield Fund	7.22%	7.13%	6.02%	5.84%	4.60%	4.91%	5.15%	5.47%	6.29%	5.65%	5.85%	6.08%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	10.46%	10.51%	11.54%	10.51%	13.43%	9.07%	7.93%	5.76%	7.12%	5.18%	3.23%	4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XYLD and LHYAX in my portfolio?

XYLD and LHYAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XYLD or LHYAX?

XYLD has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to LHYAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs LHYAX's -31.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.