PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 7.44% return.


XYLD

1D
0.27%
1M
0.88%
YTD
4.47%
6M
5.83%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
8.23%

JEPQ

1D
1.24%
1M
0.97%
YTD
7.44%
6M
7.26%
1Y
25.85%
3Y*
20.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.47%8.02%19.49%11.10%-11.85%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
7.44%15.18%24.85%36.28%-12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and JEPQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022

0.83

The correlation between XYLD and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

XYLD vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XYLD
JEPQ

Technology

35.6%
54.0%

Financial Services

11.8%
0.4%

Communication Services

11.2%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
12.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
4.4%

Industrials

8.3%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
7.1%

Energy

3.5%
0.4%

Utilities

2.3%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.0%

Technology

XYLD
35.6%
JEPQ
54.0%

Financial Services

XYLD
11.8%
JEPQ
0.4%

Communication Services

XYLD
11.2%
JEPQ
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XYLD
10.2%
JEPQ
12.8%

Healthcare

XYLD
8.5%
JEPQ
4.4%

Industrials

XYLD
8.3%
JEPQ
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

XYLD
4.9%
JEPQ
7.1%

Energy

XYLD
3.5%
JEPQ
0.4%

Utilities

XYLD
2.3%
JEPQ
1.3%

Real Estate

XYLD
1.9%
JEPQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

XYLD
1.8%
JEPQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLDJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.42

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.95

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.73

14.33

+2.40

XYLD vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLDJEPQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.13

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.96

-0.36

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-20.07%

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-8.82%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-20.07%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-2.02%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-3.42%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.81%

-0.82%

Volatility

XYLD vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 1.33%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

3.65%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

9.66%

-4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.60%

12.19%

-5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

16.67%

-5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

16.67%

-2.46%

XYLD vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLD vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.57%, more than JEPQ's 10.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.26%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.57%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEPQ has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to XYLD (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 20.04% vs 10.96% for XYLD. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 20.04% return vs 10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 10.26% for JEPQ.

XYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.35% for JEPQ.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer