XYLD vs. JEPQ
XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XYLD returned 10.96%/yr vs 20.04%/yr for JEPQ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
XYLD vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 7.44% return.
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
JEPQ
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.47% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -11.85% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.44% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD and JEPQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XYLD and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
XYLD vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XYLD
JEPQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XYLD
JEPQ
Financial Services
XYLD
JEPQ
Communication Services
XYLD
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
XYLD
JEPQ
Healthcare
XYLD
JEPQ
Industrials
XYLD
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
XYLD
JEPQ
Energy
XYLD
JEPQ
Utilities
XYLD
JEPQ
Real Estate
XYLD
JEPQ
Basic Materials
XYLD
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLD vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
XYLD
JEPQ
XYLD vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLD | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.42 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.95 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.73 | 14.33 | +2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLD | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.13 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.96 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
XYLD vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLD | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -20.07% | -13.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -8.82% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | -20.07% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -2.02% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -3.42% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 1.81% | -0.82% |
Volatility
XYLD vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 1.33%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLD | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 3.65% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 9.66% | -4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.60% | 12.19% | -5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.23% | 16.67% | -5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 16.67% | -2.46% |
XYLD vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLD vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.57%, more than JEPQ's 10.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.26% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.57% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLD and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JEPQ has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to XYLD (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 20.04% vs 10.96% for XYLD. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 20.04% return vs 10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 10.26% for JEPQ.
XYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.35% for JEPQ.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYLD and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer