XYLD vs. HYTI
XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and HYTI (FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XYLD is passively managed, while HYTI is actively managed. Over the past year, XYLD returned 17.66% vs 7.25% for HYTI. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HYTI.
Performance
XYLD vs. HYTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than HYTI's 1.84% return.
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
HYTI
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 7.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD vs. HYTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.96% | 4.87% |
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 1.84% | 7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD and HYTI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.53 |
The correlation between XYLD and HYTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLD vs. HYTI — Risk / Return Rank
XYLD
HYTI
XYLD vs. HYTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLD | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.37 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 3.06 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.84 | 12.98 | +4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLD | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 1.90 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.32 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
XYLD vs. HYTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, which is greater than HYTI's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and HYTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLD | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -4.47% | -28.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -2.38% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.05% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -0.46% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.56% | +0.43% |
Volatility
XYLD vs. HYTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 0.88%, while FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLD | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 1.14% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.37% | 3.02% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.55% | 3.83% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 5.22% | +6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 5.22% | +8.99% |
XYLD vs. HYTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HYTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLD vs. HYTI - Dividend Comparison
XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than HYTI's 10.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 10.40% | 8.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.52% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLD and HYTI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYTI has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs HYTI's -4.47%.
On 1-year performance, XYLD leads with 17.66% vs 7.25% for HYTI. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 17.66% return vs 7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HYTI.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 10.40% for HYTI.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.65% for HYTI.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYLD and HYTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer