XYLD vs. FXF
XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XYLD returned 8.14%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for FXF. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FXF.
Performance
XYLD vs. FXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than FXF's -3.50% return. Over the past 10 years, XYLD has outperformed FXF with an annualized return of 8.14%, while FXF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.08% annualized return.
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.30%
FXF
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -3.50%
- 1Y
- -3.38%
- 3Y*
- 1.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.99M | $3.23M | $5.41M | |
| $39.54M | $38.84M | $31.76M |
XYLD vs. FXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 6.98% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -3.50% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD and FXF is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013 | -0.02 |
The correlation between XYLD and FXF shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLD vs. FXF — Risk / Return Rank
XYLD
FXF
XYLD vs. FXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XYLD | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 0.93 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | -0.48 | +3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.66 | -1.15 | +17.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XYLD vs. FXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum FXF drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and FXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLD | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -35.58% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -7.15% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | -8.52% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.66% | -11.99% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.46% | -15.04% | -18.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -21.23% | +20.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -20.83% | +17.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 2.98% | -1.97% |
Volatility
XYLD vs. FXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 1.57%, while Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) has a volatility of 1.75%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLD | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 1.75% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.80% | 5.46% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.98% | 7.39% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 8.31% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 7.57% | +6.58% |
XYLD vs. FXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FXF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLD vs. FXF - Dividend Comparison
XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.63%, while FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.63% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLD and FXF have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXF has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to XYLD (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs FXF's -35.58%.
On 10-year performance, XYLD leads with 8.14% vs 1.08% for FXF. On fees, FXF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 8.14% return vs 1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.63%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
XYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while FXF is Currency. XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while FXF tracks Swiss Franc. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.40% for FXF.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYLD and FXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer