PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. FAGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. FAGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than FAGIX's 8.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XYLD having a 8.33% annualized return and FAGIX not far behind at 8.14%.


XYLD

1D
0.27%
1M
1.69%
YTD
5.52%
6M
5.95%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
8.33%

FAGIX

1D
0.70%
1M
1.92%
YTD
8.52%
6M
9.16%
1Y
18.07%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. FAGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
5.52%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%
FAGIX
Fidelity Capital & Income Fund
8.52%12.38%10.69%13.02%-11.50%11.13%9.95%18.96%-7.17%11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and FAGIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013

0.66

The correlation between XYLD and FAGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. FAGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FAGIX
FAGIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FAGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FAGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. FAGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLDFAGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.55

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

5.20

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.16

21.24

-4.07

XYLD vs. FAGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the FAGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and FAGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. FAGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum FAGIX drawdown of -37.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and FAGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDFAGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-37.97%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-3.49%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-7.26%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

-15.42%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

-28.45%

-5.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-6.98%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.85%

+0.16%

Volatility

XYLD vs. FAGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 2.21%, while Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDFAGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

2.74%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.76%

5.38%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

6.47%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.26%

6.68%

+4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.22%

7.85%

+6.37%

XYLD vs. FAGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FAGIX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLD vs. FAGIX - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.46%, more than FAGIX's 5.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAGIX
Fidelity Capital & Income Fund
5.23%4.74%5.02%5.28%10.25%6.08%4.59%5.00%5.67%5.05%4.57%4.51%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.46%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and FAGIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAGIX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to XYLD (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs FAGIX's -37.97%.

FAGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and FAGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer