PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. DJIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. DJIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than DJIA's 3.46% return.


XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%

DJIA

1D
0.02%
1M
3.32%
YTD
3.46%
6M
3.90%
1Y
14.53%
3Y*
10.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. DJIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.96%8.02%19.49%11.10%-8.11%
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
3.46%9.11%14.52%9.15%-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and DJIA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.71

The correlation between XYLD and DJIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

XYLD vs. DJIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XYLD
DJIA

Technology

35.6%
17.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
27.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
11.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
13.1%

Industrials

8.3%
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.4%

Energy

3.5%
2.4%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.0%

Technology

XYLD
35.6%
DJIA
17.1%

Financial Services

XYLD
11.8%
DJIA
27.2%

Communication Services

XYLD
11.2%
DJIA
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XYLD
10.2%
DJIA
11.6%

Healthcare

XYLD
8.5%
DJIA
13.1%

Industrials

XYLD
8.3%
DJIA
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

XYLD
4.9%
DJIA
4.4%

Energy

XYLD
3.5%
DJIA
2.4%

Utilities

XYLD
2.3%
DJIA

-

Real Estate

XYLD
1.9%
DJIA

-

Basic Materials

XYLD
1.8%
DJIA
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. DJIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DJIA
DJIA Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DJIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJIA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DJIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. DJIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLDDJIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.39

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

1.99

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.84

7.38

+10.46

XYLD vs. DJIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the DJIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and DJIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLDDJIADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

1.89

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.69

-0.09

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. DJIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, which is greater than DJIA's maximum drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and DJIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDDJIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-16.91%

-16.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-7.34%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-12.09%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.13%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-3.59%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.97%

-0.98%

Volatility

XYLD vs. DJIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 0.88%, while Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DJIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDDJIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

1.66%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

6.24%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.55%

7.74%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.22%

11.19%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

11.19%

+3.02%

XYLD vs. DJIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XYLD and DJIA have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

XYLD vs. DJIA - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, less than DJIA's 10.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
10.82%10.60%11.44%7.16%9.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and DJIA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DJIA has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs DJIA's -16.91%.

On 3-year performance, XYLD leads with 11.27% vs 10.50% for DJIA. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 10.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYLD and DJIA have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

DJIA has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 10.52% for XYLD.

XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while DJIA tracks DJIA Cboe BuyWrite v2 Index.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and DJIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer