XYLD vs. ARMW
XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XYLD is passively managed, while ARMW is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
XYLD vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
ARMW
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- 128.75%
- YTD
- 363.23%
- 6M
- 245.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.96% | 4.31% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 363.23% | -40.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD and ARMW is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.48 |
XYLD vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XYLD
ARMW
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XYLD
ARMW
Financial Services
XYLD
ARMW
-
Communication Services
XYLD
ARMW
-
Consumer Cyclical
XYLD
ARMW
-
Healthcare
XYLD
ARMW
-
Industrials
XYLD
ARMW
-
Consumer Defensive
XYLD
ARMW
-
Energy
XYLD
ARMW
-
Utilities
XYLD
ARMW
-
Real Estate
XYLD
ARMW
-
Basic Materials
XYLD
ARMW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLD vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
XYLD
ARMW
XYLD vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLD | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLD | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 4.96 | -4.36 |
Drawdowns
XYLD vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLD | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -48.47% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -26.55% | +22.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | — | — |
Volatility
XYLD vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLD | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.55% | 88.46% | -81.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 88.46% | -77.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 88.46% | -74.25% |
XYLD vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLD vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 15.20% | 16.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.52% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLD and ARMW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 10.52% for XYLD.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for XYLD and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer