PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.


XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%

ARMW

1D
3.44%
1M
128.75%
YTD
363.23%
6M
245.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.96%4.31%
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
363.23%-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and ARMW is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.48

XYLD vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XYLD
ARMW

Technology

35.6%
36.0%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

XYLD
35.6%
ARMW
36.0%

Financial Services

XYLD
11.8%
ARMW

-

Communication Services

XYLD
11.2%
ARMW

-

Consumer Cyclical

XYLD
10.2%
ARMW

-

Healthcare

XYLD
8.5%
ARMW

-

Industrials

XYLD
8.3%
ARMW

-

Consumer Defensive

XYLD
4.9%
ARMW

-

Energy

XYLD
3.5%
ARMW

-

Utilities

XYLD
2.3%
ARMW

-

Real Estate

XYLD
1.9%
ARMW

-

Basic Materials

XYLD
1.8%
ARMW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLDARMWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.84

XYLD vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLDARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

4.96

-4.36

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-48.47%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-26.55%

+22.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

Volatility

XYLD vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDARMWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.55%

88.46%

-81.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.22%

88.46%

-77.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

88.46%

-74.25%

XYLD vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLD vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
15.20%16.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and ARMW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 10.52% for XYLD.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer