XYLD.L vs. XZBU.L
XYLD.L (Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D) and XZBU.L (Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C) are both Corporate Bonds funds from Xtrackers tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.16% expense ratio.
Performance
XYLD.L vs. XZBU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XYLD.L is traded in USD, while XZBU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XZBU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
XYLD.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- —
XZBU.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD.L vs. XZBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLD.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D | 0.71% | 6.19% | 4.89% | 5.76% | -8.70% | 0.36% | 4.16% |
XZBU.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C | 34.79% | 8.26% | 0.97% | 8.41% | -18.49% | -1.77% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD.L and XZBU.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XYLD.L and XZBU.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLD.L vs. XZBU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XYLD.L
XZBU.L
XYLD.L vs. XZBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLD.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLD.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XYLD.L vs. XZBU.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLD.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | — | — |
Volatility
XYLD.L vs. XZBU.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLD.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.22% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.83% | — | — |
XYLD.L vs. XZBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XYLD.L and XZBU.L have an expense ratio of 0.16%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XYLD.L vs. XZBU.L - Dividend Comparison
XYLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, while XZBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLD.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D | 3.76% | 3.61% | 3.34% | 2.88% | 6.03% | 3.88% | 3.78% | 2.92% |
XZBU.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLD.L and XZBU.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.16% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XYLD.L and XZBU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.16% per year.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD.
Find the right allocation for XYLD.L and XZBU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer