XYL vs. HYFM
XYL (Xylem Inc.) and HYFM (Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — XYL in Specialty Industrial Machinery, HYFM in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery. Over the past 5 years, XYL returned -0.21%/yr vs -72.17%/yr for HYFM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XYL vs. HYFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYL achieves a -18.57% return, which is significantly higher than HYFM's -38.90% return.
XYL
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- -18.57%
- 6M
- -19.12%
- 1Y
- -11.15%
- 3Y*
- 1.00%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
HYFM
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -7.74%
- YTD
- -38.90%
- 6M
- -55.64%
- 1Y
- -71.26%
- 3Y*
- -54.04%
- 5Y*
- -72.17%
- 10Y*
- —
XYL vs. HYFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYL Xylem Inc. | -18.57% | 18.78% | 2.57% | 4.77% | -6.60% | 18.94% | 3.31% |
HYFM Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. | -38.90% | -73.97% | -36.78% | -40.81% | -94.52% | -46.20% | 14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYL and HYFM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.24 |
The correlation between XYL and HYFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
XYL:
$26.79B
HYFM:
$4.40M
XYL:
$4.02
HYFM:
-$61.90
XYL:
3.85
HYFM:
0.04
XYL:
$6.97B
HYFM:
$122.24M
XYL:
$2.71B
HYFM:
$10.17M
XYL:
$1.41B
HYFM:
-$21.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYL vs. HYFM — Risk / Return Rank
XYL
HYFM
XYL vs. HYFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xylem Inc. (XYL) and Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XYL | HYFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.85 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.88 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | -1.29 | +0.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XYL vs. HYFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYL drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, smaller than the maximum HYFM drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYL and HYFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYL | HYFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -99.92% | +53.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.04% | -83.04% | +53.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.04% | -95.07% | +65.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.69% | -99.87% | +53.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.30% | -99.90% | +72.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -86.28% | +75.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.54% | 56.84% | -43.30% |
Volatility
XYL vs. HYFM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xylem Inc. (XYL) is 6.01%, while Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM) has a volatility of 13.24%. This indicates that XYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYL | HYFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 13.24% | -7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 75.85% | -56.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 100.30% | -75.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 94.62% | -68.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.30% | 94.52% | -67.22% |
Dividends
XYL vs. HYFM - Dividend Comparison
XYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while HYFM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYFM Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYL Xylem Inc. | 1.51% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.15% | 1.09% | 0.93% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.26% | 1.06% | 1.25% | 1.54% |
Financials
XYL vs. HYFM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xylem Inc. and Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
XYL and HYFM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYFM has higher volatility (13.24%) compared to XYL (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYL dropped -46.69% vs HYFM's -99.92%.
XYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYL and HYFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer