HYFM vs. PANW
HYFM (Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.) and PANW (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.) are both stocks. HYFM operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while PANW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, HYFM returned -73.16%/yr vs 38.03%/yr for PANW. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HYFM vs. PANW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYFM achieves a -46.75% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 76.93% return.
HYFM
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- -12.85%
- 6M
- -56.54%
- YTD
- -46.75%
- 1Y
- -78.90%
- 3Y*
- -55.62%
- 5Y*
- -73.16%
- 10Y*
- —
PANW
- 1D
- -3.67%
- 1M
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 72.42%
- YTD
- 76.93%
- 1Y
- 73.92%
- 3Y*
- 37.59%
- 5Y*
- 38.03%
- 10Y*
- 31.46%
HYFM vs. PANW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYFM Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. | -46.75% | -73.97% | -36.78% | -40.81% | -94.52% | -46.20% | 14.30% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 76.93% | 1.23% | 23.41% | 111.32% | -24.81% | 56.66% | 17.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYFM and PANW is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.22 |
The correlation between HYFM and PANW shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HYFM:
$3.83M
PANW:
$222.11B
HYFM:
-$61.73
PANW:
$1.17
HYFM:
0.03
PANW:
22.09
HYFM:
$122.24M
PANW:
$10.61B
HYFM:
$10.17M
PANW:
$7.63B
HYFM:
-$21.47M
PANW:
$1.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYFM vs. PANW — Risk / Return Rank
HYFM
PANW
HYFM vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYFM | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.29 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 1.95 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 4.42 | -5.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYFM vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYFM drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYFM and PANW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYFM | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -47.98% | -51.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.08% | -36.01% | -48.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.37% | -36.01% | -59.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.87% | -36.01% | -63.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -8.84% | -91.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.45% | -14.63% | -71.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.85% | 15.82% | +45.03% |
Volatility
HYFM vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison
Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM) has a higher volatility of 23.96% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) at 16.41%. This indicates that HYFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYFM | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.96% | 16.41% | +7.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.70% | 34.99% | +26.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.78% | 41.49% | +59.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.07% | 42.22% | +52.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.39% | 38.84% | +55.55% |
Dividends
HYFM vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison
Neither HYFM nor PANW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HYFM vs. PANW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HYFM vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison
HYFM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.84M and revenue of 28.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.4%.
PANW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
HYFM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.73M and revenue of 28.52M, resulting in an operating margin of -30.6%.
PANW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.
HYFM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. reported a net income of -14.61M and revenue of 28.52M, resulting in a net margin of -51.2%.
PANW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HYFM and PANW have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYFM has higher volatility (23.96%) compared to PANW (16.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYFM dropped -99.92% vs PANW's -47.98%.
PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYFM and PANW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer