PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXV vs. COSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXV vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF (XXV) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXV achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 12.13% return.


XXV

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.95%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COSW

1D
0.92%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
12.13%
6M
2.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXV vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XXV and COSW is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXV vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF (XXV) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XXV vs. COSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXVCOSWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.01

+1.37

Drawdowns

XXV vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXV drawdown since its inception was -8.90%, smaller than the maximum COSW drawdown of -16.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXV and COSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXVCOSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-16.24%

+7.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-14.62%

+12.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-4.17%

+2.08%

Volatility

XXV vs. COSW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXVCOSWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

26.10%

-13.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.52%

26.10%

-13.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.52%

26.10%

-13.58%

XXV vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than COSW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXV vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

XXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.84%, less than COSW's 18.13% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XXV and COSW have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XXV is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XXV is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 12.84% for XXV.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XXV and 0.99% for COSW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXV and COSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer