XXTW.L vs. XGDG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XXTW.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF) and XGDG.L (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - XXTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index, while XGDG.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XXTW.L returned 51.91% vs 31.32% for XGDG.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. XXTW.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for XGDG.L.

Performance

XXTW.L vs. XGDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XXTW.L is traded in GBP, while XGDG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XGDG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXTW.L achieves a 24.48% return, which is significantly higher than XGDG.L's 3.04% return.

XXTW.L

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: 12.87%
• YTD: 24.48%
• 6M: 22.47%
• 1Y: 51.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XGDG.L

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -4.84%
• YTD: 3.04%
• 6M: 5.32%
• 1Y: 31.32%
• 3Y*: 30.11%
• 5Y*: 17.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXTW.L vs. XGDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XXTW.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF	24.48%	13.82%	36.21%	14.56%
XGDG.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities	3.04%	63.15%	25.16%	7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XXTW.L and XGDG.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023	-0.03

Return for Risk

XXTW.L vs. XGDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXTW.L

XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 76
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

XGDG.L

XGDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
XGDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
XGDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
XGDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 37
XGDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XGDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXTW.L vs. XGDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XXTW.L	XGDG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	1.22	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	1.63	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.24	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	1.66	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.22	4.40	+3.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XXTW.L vs. XGDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the XGDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXTW.L and XGDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XXTW.L	XGDG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	1.22	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	0.87	+0.64

Drawdowns

XXTW.L vs. XGDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXTW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.44%, which is greater than XGDG.L's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXTW.L and XGDG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XXTW.L	XGDG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.44%	-23.31%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.79%	-18.55%	+1.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	-16.27%	+13.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.02%	-8.24%	+3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.43%	6.99%	-0.56%

Volatility

XXTW.L vs. XGDG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L) at 6.31%. This indicates that XXTW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XXTW.L	XGDG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.76%	6.31%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.37%	22.33%	-7.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.30%	25.24%	-5.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.48%	17.42%	+4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.48%	17.30%	+4.18%

XXTW.L vs. XGDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXTW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XGDG.L's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

XXTW.L vs. XGDG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXTW.L nor XGDG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XXTW.L and XGDG.L in my portfolio?

XXTW.L and XGDG.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XXTW.L or XGDG.L?

On fees, XXTW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XXTW.L or XGDG.L?

XXTW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XGDG.L.

What is the main difference between XXTW.L and XGDG.L?

XXTW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XGDG.L is Precious Metals. XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index, while XGDG.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XXTW.L and 0.28% for XGDG.L.